B U S I N E S S   L A W  

 

 
   

Confidential Disclosure Agreements

The three be's

In many transactions, the first legal agreement to be discussed is a confidential disclosure agreement ("CDA"). The parties often need to exchange information prior to proceeding with the time and expense of detailed negotiations. A CDA facilitates this exchange by establishing the conditions under which the parties will provide confidential information and by imposing legal obligations upon its receipt. While intended as a preliminary step, a CDA can nevertheless have long-lasting consequences. In reviewing and preparing a CDA, three rules may keep these obligations in their proper perspective and avoid unintended consequences in the event the transaction does not proceed.

Be clear. The CDA imposes affirmative obligations to hold items in confidence. This requires active monitoring and safekeeping. It may also restrict a company's development activities and those of its employees. All of this has costs. Breach, even if inadvertent or by a former employee, can lead to litigation, injunctions, damages and legal fees. Therefore, always question whether a preliminary exchange of confidences is really required. If so, make certain that the CDA covers only material that the parties reasonably need to make their decisions, and define the protected material with precision.

Require information, in order to be protected, to be in writing and conspicuously marked as confidential. If oral delivery is unavoidable, insist that the discloser promptly confirm the material's confidential status in a non-confidential written summary.

Unless the recipient insists on an adequate paper trail, it will be forced to make a case-by-case determination about every bit of information each of its personnel receives, subject to second-guessing by a court or arbitrator. A clear paper trail will

also reduce the legal burden and expense should a disagreement arise, often years after the initial disclosure, when memories , have become murky. Clear documentation will also make identification of third-party confidential information easier in the event of a sale of the business, and may keep a disappointed customer, supplier, or former suitor from hindering a future sale under the guise of a broad claim of confidentiality.

Be limited. First, limit the use of the confidential information. Remember that a CDA is the first, not the last, step in the transaction. Therefore, the agreement should precisely state the purpose of the disclosure. and limit the recipient's use of the information solely to that purpose.

Second, limit the number of individuals who will have access to the confidential information. If feasible, the CDA should identify the persons who are authorized to receive the information, by name, by class or by position. The information should go no

farther within the company and its advisors than is necessary for the limited purpose of the disclosure. This is particularly important if the recipient insists that it be free to pursue the independent development of material similar to the confidential information. The nature of the information being disclosed and its intended use (consider the difference between a merger, on the one hand, and the pricing of a part, on the other) make it imprudent to rely on generic boilerplate in defining the protected information.

Third, limit the duration of the CDA. As a general rule, the obligation of confidence should last only as long as the time it would take to reverse-engineer the information or for the information to reach the trade through ordinary channels. The length of time will vary based on the nature and sensitivity of the information, as well as on industry practice. Failing to specify a cut-off date, however, will mean that the recipient must hold the information in confidence forever, or at least until the recipient can demonstrate that the information has reached the public domain. In addition to imposing an unwarranted burden on the recipient, such an indefinite obligation may be viewed negatively by future acquirers or public markets.

Finally, limit the representations contained in the CDA. Disclaim warranties, including patent infringement. Leave warranties and reliance to the definitive agreement, assuming the transaction proceeds.

Be Prepared. Every CDA does not lead to a completed transaction. The CDA should anticipate this possibility, and should require return or destruction of the confidential material (including all copies) on cessation of the discussions. Exceptions to confidentiality should be specified. Generally, these include information in the public domain, information that the recipient knew already, information that the recipient receives independently from others , and information that the recipient is legally

required to disclose, i.e. by subpoena or by regulation.

Examine each exception in light of the information to be disclosed and its intended use. For example, defining "information in the public domain" as "information generally known to the public" may be far too restrictive. Certain information may be generally known to experts in the field or industry and still be unknown to the person in the street. Careful consideration should also be given to the merits of agreeing to the so-called "independent developments" exception, which permits a recipient to

use information that it subsequently develops on its own, even if that information turns out to be identical to material furnished by the discloser. A person disclosing a truly unique and revolutionary idea should resist this exception. If you can't avoid it altogether, limit this exception to information developed only by persons about whom the recipient can affirmatively demonstrate were not exposed to the original confidential information. This shifts the burden to the recipient to show that its hands are clean.

Preliminary discussions can alert the other party to a company's key personnel. A non-solicitation clause is worth considering, particularly when dealing with a competitor. The parties should also allow for the possibility of a subsequent dispute about the CDA.. Which state's law governs the agreement, consent to jurisdiction, and a provision for an award of attorneys' fees to the prevailing party in the event of subsequent litigation are all subjects worthy of discussion and inclusion in the CDA.

By focusing on the "be's," the parties to a CDA can ensure that the realities of their business, and not the unintended consequences of boilerplate drafting, govern their relationship, however long- or short-lived the underlying transaction turns out to be.

 

 

K O T I N ,  C R A B T R E E  &  S T R O N G ,  L L P

 
 
 
One Bowdoin Square
Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2925

Voice:  (617) 227 7031
Facsimile:  (617) 367 2988
TTY:  (617) 720 3558
Email:  kcs@kcslegal.com

 

 

This page updated: February 13, 2001. Copyright © 1999-2002 by Kotin, Crabtree & Strong, LLP. All rights reserved.